Despite some safety concerns, an FDA advisory committee on Friday voted 8 to 4 in favor of Japan-based Seikagaku’s condoliase injection for the treatment of radicular leg pain associated with lumbar disc herniation in adults.
Much of the discussion centered on one of Seikagaku’s three clinical trials presented before the committee that failed on its primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints. Overall, the members of the FDA’s Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee said the negative study should be weighed appropriately by the agency, and they raised short and long-term safety questions about the injection.
Committee chair Brian Bateman of Stanford University School of Medicine, who voted against the injection, cautioned that the population in the negative, US-based study “might reflect the population that would ultimately use it.” He also noted several safety concerns, including that the drug has to be used in a setting that can treat anaphylaxis, and that those receiving the drug can be at risk of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).
Committee panelist Steven Schiff, professor of neurosurgery at Yale University, who voted in favor of condoliase, also raised concerns about larger numbers of people accessing it.
“I could envision in the next years, a million people might get this therapy,” Schiff said, and if the prevalence of SCARs is about one in 1,000, as Seikagaku estimates, a few hundred cases of these life-threatening reactions in the US “might cause the FDA to think twice” about the approval.
Michael Sprintz of Ethos Behavioral Health Group in Houston voted in favor of the injection but said he hopes the label will be appropriately narrow and ensure that those who receive it fail on the more commonly used therapies.
Lumbar disc herniation can cause lower back or leg pain, but is typically resolved with existing medicines. About 20% to 50% of those in pain progress to surgery, Seikagaku
said
Friday. The company has presented condoliase as a less invasive alternative to surgery. About 29,000 patients have been treated with condoliase, first approved in Japan in 2018, the company said.
Two of the studies were based in the US, but only one of those was positive. One key way that the two trials differed was that in the positive trial, the company used MRIs to find evidence of nerve impingement before administering the drug. But some of the panelists questioned if the MRI scans were the primary reason for the differences between the failed and positive studies.
Schiff noted that the two US-based studies had very different populations and indications. And while he’s not surprised by the one failed study, he did ask: “How do you translate the success of the second study given the very rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria? How does that get translated into approval?”
DJ Kennedy of the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, who voted in favor of the drug, also said that the application of condoliase in the real world will likely be more similar to what occurred in the negative study, “unless there’s significant efforts to make that not the case.”
But the experience of using the drug in Japan could be informative to the FDA in making its approval decision.
‘The longer term studies out of Japan are reassuring, maybe not completely sufficient, but they are reassuring,” Kennedy said.