This study is being done to answer the following question: What are the effects of a new drug or drugs on ovarian cancer? The pre-study screening may be done to test a sample of tissue for biomarkers to determine participation in the study.

开始日期2022-05-03

申办/合作机构

Canadian Cancer Trials Group

[+3]

NCT04681131

/ Active, not recruiting临床2期

A Phase 2 Study of BA3011 Alone and in Combination with PD-1 Inhibitor in Adult Patients with Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Had Prior Disease Progression on a PD-1/L-1 Inhibitor, EGFR, or ALK Inhibitor.

The objective of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of CAB-AXL-ADC in NSCLC

开始日期2021-03-17

申办/合作机构

BioAtla, Inc.

NCT03425279

/ Active, not recruiting临床1/2期

A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of Mecbotamab Vedotin (BA3011) Alone and in Combination with Nivolumab in Adult and Adolescent Patients 12 Years and Older with Advanced Solid Tumors

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of mecbotamab vedotin (BA3011) in solid tumors.

开始日期2018-02-15

申办/合作机构

BioAtla, Inc.

100 项与 Mecbotamab vedotin 相关的临床结果

登录后查看更多信息

100 项与 Mecbotamab vedotin 相关的转化医学

登录后查看更多信息

100 项与 Mecbotamab vedotin 相关的专利（医药）

登录后查看更多信息

585

项与 Mecbotamab vedotin 相关的文献（医药）

2025-04-01·BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY

Fine-tuning phenoxy silyl scaffolds for the development of glutathione-responsive prodrugs and antibody–drug conjugates

Article

作者: Qi, Cheng ; Jiang, Yuecheng ; Yu, Xianqiang ; Chen, Hongli ; Wei, Ding ; Wang, Huihui ; Huangfu, Shangwei ; Jiang, Biao

Silyl ether is particularly attractive for application in drug development for its easy preparation, non-toxicity and remarkable biocompatibility. Earlier studies relied on the use of intracellular acidic conditions to induce the cleavage of alkoxy silyl ethers. However, acidic conditions are not suitable to trigger the release of phenoxy silyl ethers, since they are more stable under acidic conditions compared with neutral conditions. We explored the vulnerability of the phenoxy silyl ether towards biological nucleophilic reagents and found that glutathione (GSH) could effectively and selectively induce the cleavage of phenoxy silyl ether. We also demonstrated that the rate of cleavage was controllable by adjusting the substituents on the phenyl ring. Phenoxy silyl ether-based prodrugs and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) were designed and synthesized, which could be effectively activated in cells with high GSH levels and there was an obvious therapeutic window between cells with different GSH levels.

2025-02-19·BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY

A Unique Prodrug Targeting the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for the Delivery of Monomethyl Auristatin E

Article

作者: Bomba, Hunter N. ; Langton-Webster, Beatrice ; Fulton, Melody D. ; Berkman, Clifford E. ; Savoy, Emily A.

Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) is a promising treatment option for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa); however, toxicities prevent MMAE from being administered as free drug. No MMAE-based treatment is currently marketed for PCa. Herein, we describe a small-molecule-drug conjugate, CTT2274, for the selective delivery of MMAE. CTT2274 is composed of a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-binding scaffold, a biphenyl motif, a pH-sensitive phosphoramidate linker, and MMAE payload. We demonstrate that CTT2274 shows selective binding to PSMA, which is overexpressed on PCa cells, and induces tumor cell death in vitro. In a patient-derived xenograft tumor model of PCa in mice, we show that weekly intravenous dosing of CTT2274 at 3.6 mg/kg for six weeks is superior to treatment with free MMAE at equivalent doses. Mice treated with CTT2274 experienced prolonged tumor suppression and significantly greater overall survival than mice treated with PBS. Additionally, the safety of CTT2274 compared to an equivalent dose of MMAE was assessed in healthy, non-tumor-bearing mice. Our results demonstrate that CTT2274 therapy is as efficacious as MMAE, results in superior overall survival, and has a more favorable safety profile. Together, these data indicate that CTT2274 is a candidate for clinical translation for the treatment of PCa.

2025-02-18·ACS Nano

Nanobody-Mediated Cellular Uptake Maximizes the Potency of Polylysine Dendrimers While Preserving Solid Tumor Penetration

Article

作者: Fletcher, Nicholas L. ; Humphries, James ; Yuen, Daniel ; Hufton, Richard ; Porter, Christopher J.H. ; Johnston, Angus P.R. ; Feeney, Orlagh M. ; Houston, Zachary H ; McLeod, Victoria M. ; Thurecht, Kristofer J. ; Owen, David J. ; Tsegay, Sammi ; Shengule, Sudhir ; Cullinane, Carleen ; Reitano, Pauline ; Noi, Leo

Dendrimers are branched macromolecular structures that are useful nanocarriers for small-molecule drugs, such as cancer therapeutics. Their small size permits penetration into solid tumors, coupled with functionalization with a low-fouling PEG coating that minimizes transient cellular interactions and enhances plasma circulation time. While PEGylated dendrimers show significant promise as anticancer therapeutics, there is potential to increase tumor cell specificity and drive uptake of drugs into cells by conjugating cell-targeting ligands onto the dendrimers. To achieve this, we used an expanded genetic code and bio-orthogonal click chemistry to functionalize monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE)-loaded PEGylated dendrimers with a single tumor cell-targeting nanobody per dendrimer. The uniform addition of a single nanobody ligand facilitated greater intracellular uptake of the drug payload into HER2-positive target cells, while preserving the desirable circulatory characteristics of dendrimers. While the nanobody-dendrimer conjugates show similar levels of tumor infiltration over 24 h compared to unmodified dendrimers, the targeted dendrimers had significantly greater inhibition of tumor growth and long-term retention in the tumors. Our results highlight that biodistribution studies alone are poor predictors of therapeutic performance. The controlled conjugation strategy presented here preserves the size advantage and tissue penetration of dendrimers while maximizing targeted cellular uptake and potency in difficult-to-access solid tumor tissue.

项与 Mecbotamab vedotin 相关的新闻（医药）

2025-03-06

·PRNewswire

TEPMETKO Continues to Strengthens its Position as a Leading METex14 Skipping NSCLC Therapy | DelveInsight

With increasing biomarker-driven cancer treatments, TEPMETKO benefits from growing adoption in precision oncology. Competition from other MET inhibitors like TABRECTA (capmatinib) exists, but TEPMETKO's once-daily dosing and efficacy profile offer differentiation. LAS VEGAS, March 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- DelveInsight's " TEPMETKO Market Size, Forecast, and Market Insight Report" highlights the details around TEPMETKO, a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. The report provides product descriptions, patent details, and competitor products (marketed and emerging therapies) of TEPMETKO. The report also highlights the historical and forecasted sales from 2020 to 2034 segmented into 7MM [the United States, the EU4 (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain), the United Kingdom, and Japan]. EMD Serono's TEPMETKO (tepotinib) Overview TEPMETKO is a kinase inhibitor prescribed for adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying MET exon 14 skipping alterations. The active component is Tepotinib (as hydrochloride monohydrate), administered orally. Patients should be cautioned about the heightened risk of severe or fatal interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, liver toxicity, and potential embryo-fetal toxicity, necessitating effective contraception during and shortly after treatment. Tepotinib specifically targets MET, including variants with exon 14 skipping mutations. It blocks HGF-dependent and independent MET phosphorylation, disrupting MET-driven signaling pathways. Additionally, at clinically relevant concentrations, Tepotinib inhibits melatonin 2 and imidazoline 1 receptors. In vitro studies show that it suppresses tumor cell proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, and migration of MET-dependent cancer cells. In mouse models with MET-driven tumors, including those with MET exon 14 skipping alterations, Tepotinib reduced tumor growth, sustained MET phosphorylation inhibition, and, in one case, decreased metastasis formation. The recommended dose of TEPMETKO is 450 mg taken orally once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurs. Patients should take it at the same time each day, swallowing tablets whole without chewing, crushing, or splitting them. If a dose is missed and less than eight hours remain until the next scheduled dose, patients should skip it. In cases of vomiting after taking TEPMETKO, the next dose should be taken at the usual time. Learn more about TEPMETKO projected market size for NSCLC @ TEPMETKO Market Potential Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for 81% of all diagnosed cases. Early detection greatly improves outcomes, but diagnosing NSCLC and other lung cancers is challenging because their symptoms are often mistaken for common illnesses or the long-term effects of smoking. Consequently, 80% of NSCLC cases are already at advanced stages by the time they are identified, making treatment more difficult. Around 80% of EGFR mutations in NSCLC involve either exon 19 deletions or the exon 21 L858R substitution, both of which are classified as sensitizing mutations. Until the last decade, chemotherapy was the primary treatment for advanced and metastatic lung cancer. However, this changed in 2015 with the approval of the first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), as a second-line therapy for advanced cases. This was followed by TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) in 2016. Both therapies were later approved for first-line treatment, broadening their use to a larger patient population. In 2020, the combination of OPDIVO (nivolumab) and ipilimumab also received approval as a first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC. According to DelveInsight, the NSCLC market size across the 7MM is projected to grow from USD 30 billion in 2024, with a substantial CAGR through 2034. This growth is largely driven by the introduction of emerging therapies during the forecast period (2025–2034). Discover more about the NSCLC market in detail @ Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market Report Emerging Competitors of TEPMETKO The NSCLC pipeline is very robust with the promising therapies such as Telisotuzumab vedotin (AbbVie), Patritumab deruxtecan (Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca), Datopotamab deruxtecan (Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca), Eftilagimod alpha (Immutep), BNT311/GEN1046 (acasunlimab) (Genmab), V940 (mRNA-4157) + Pembrolizumab (Moderna Therapeutics/Merck), Plinabulin + Docetaxel (BeyondSpring), Olomorasib (LY3537982) (Eli Lilly and Company), Zipalertinib (Cullinan Oncology/Taiho Pharma), Ceralasertib (AZD6738) (AstraZeneca), TEDOPI (EP-2101; IDM 2101; OSE-2101) (OSE Immuno-therapeutics), Sigvotatug vedotin (PF08046047) (Pfizer), ANKTIVA (N-803) (ImmunityBio), Aumolertinib/Almonertinib/HS-10206 (Jiangsu Hansoh Pharmaceutical), Niraparib (GSK), Savolitinib (AstraZeneca/Hutchison MediPharma), TRODELVY (Gilead Sciences), Pyrotinib (Jiangsu HengRui Medicine), Ociperlimab (BGB-A1217) (BieGene), Volrustomig (AstraZeneca), Gotistobart (BNT316/ONC-392) (OncoC4/BioNTech), Ivonescimab (AK112/SMT112) (Akeso Biopharma/Summit Therapeutics), ZYNYZ (retifanlimab/INCMGA00012) (Incyte/Macrogenics), Divarasib (GDC-6036) (Roche/Genentech), Tiragolumab (RG6058) (Roche), Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Merck and Kelun-Biotech), JEMPERLI (dostarlimab/TSR-042) (GSK and AnaptysBio), Zongertinib (BI-1810631) (Boehringer Ingelheim), BAY 2927088 (Bayer), Serplulimab (HLX10) (Shanghai Henlius Biotech), Rilvegostomig (AZD2936) (AstraZeneca), MK-1084 (Merck, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Astex), Domvanalimab (Arcus Biosciences and Gilead Sciences), OPDUALAG (nivolumab and relatlimab) (Bristol-Myers Squibb), Belrestotug + JEMPERLI (iTeos Therapeutics and GSK), Firmonertinib (ArriVent BioPharma), Sunvozertinib (DZD9008) (Dizal Pharmaceutical), Cobolimab (GSK), Livmoniplimab (AbbVie), Fianlimab (REGN3767) (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), BNT327/PM8002 (Biotheus/BioNTech), HS-20117 (Hansoh BioMedical), IO102-IO103 + Pembrolizumab (IO Biotech), Naptumomab estafenatox (NeoTX Therapeutics/Active Biotech), FF-10832 (FUJIFILM Corporation), BNT116 (BioNTechSE/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), CAN-2409 (Candel Therapeutics), Mecbotamab Vedotin (BA3011/CAB-AXL-ADC) (BioAtla), Bemcentinib (BGB 324/BGB-3234/R-428) (BerGenBio/Rigel Pharmaceuticals), DOVBLERON (taletrectinib/AB-106/IBI-344) (Nuvation Bio/Innovent Biologics/Daiichi Sankyo/Nippon Kayaku), Lifileucel (Iovance Biotherapeutics), IBI363 (Innovent Biologics), Sotevtamab (AB-16B5) (Alethia Biotherapeutics), Avutometinib (VS6766) (Verastem Oncology), Vebreltinib (APL-101) (Apollomics), LP-300 (Lantern Pharma), JNJ-90301900 (Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine), AMG 193 (Amgen), Luveltamab tazevibulin (Sutro Biopharma), PRT3789 (Prelude Therapeutics), Disitamab vedotin (Seagen), PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin) (Astellas Pharma), RP1 (Replimune), TIVDAK (tisotumab vedotin) (Seagen), Zanidatamab (Jazz Pharmaceuticals), Utidelone injectable (UTD1) (Beijing Biostar Pharmaceuticals), REGN5093-M114 (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), SLC-391 (SignalChem Lifesciences), fulzerasib (GenFleet), Davutamig (REGN5093) (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), TAS3351 (Taiho Oncology), H002 (RedCloud Bio), JIN-A02 (J INTS BIO), FWD1509 (Forward Pharma), Sabestomig (AZD7789) (AstraZeneca), Sasanlimab (Pfizer), Selvigaltin (GB1211) (Galecto Biotech), Vepafestinib Helsinn (Healthcare/Taiho Pharmaceutical), EP0031 (A400/ KL590586) (Ellipses Pharma/Kelun-Biotech), Pamvatamig (MCLA-129) (Merus), Zidesamtinib (NVL-520) (Nuvalent), NVL-655 (Nuvalent), RMC-4630 (Revolution Medicines), REQORSA (quaratusugene ozeplasmid) (Genprex), PDC*lung01 (PDC*line Pharma), Evalstotug (BA3071) (BioAtla and BeiGene), PT-112 (Promontory Therapeutics), MRT-2359 (Monte Rosa Therapeutics), GAIA-102 (GAIA BioMedicine), Rigosertib (Traws Pharma), HMBD-001 (Hummingbird Bioscience), PLB1004 (Avistone Biotechnology), ANS03 (Avistone Biotechnology), MYTX-011 (Mythic Therapeutics), A166 (Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Bio-pharmaceutical), Atamparib (BN-2397) (Ribon Therapeutics), DELTACEL (KB-GDT-01) (Kiromic BioPharma), Carotuximab (ENV-105) (Kairos Pharma), YL202 (MediLink Therapeutics), and others. To know more about the number of competing drugs in development, visit @ TEPMETKO Market Positioning Compared to Other Drugs Key Milestones of TEPMETKO In February 2024, the FDA granted traditional approval to TEPMETKO for adult patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. In February 2022, the EC approved TEPMETKO as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with advanced NSCLC harboring alterations leading to METex14 skipping who require systemic therapy following prior treatment with immunotherapy and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. In February 2021, Merck announced that the US FDA has approved TEPMETKO following priority review for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. This indication was approved under accelerated approval based on ORR and DOR. In October 2020, TEPMETKO received ODD for treating NSCLC with MET genomic tumor aberrations In March 2020, EMD Serono (the biopharmaceutical business of Merck KGaA), announced that the MHLW approved TEPMETKO for the treatment of patients with unresectable, advanced, or recurrent NSCLC with METex14 skipping alterations. In September 2019, the US FDA granted BTD for tepotinib in patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring METex14 skipping alterations who progressed following platinum-based cancer therapy Discover how TEPMETKO is shaping the NSCLC treatment landscape @ TEPMETKO NSCLC TEPMETKO Market Dynamics TEPMETKO competes in a growing but highly specialized market where MET-targeted therapies are gaining traction due to their efficacy in addressing MET-altered tumors. The market for MET inhibitors is expanding as precision oncology advances and molecular diagnostics become more widely available, enabling better identification of patients who would benefit from targeted treatments like TEPMETKO. A key factor shaping TEPMETKO's market dynamics is competition. It directly competes with Novartis' TABRECTA (capmatinib), another MET inhibitor approved for the same indication. While TEPMETKO offers the advantage of once-daily dosing compared to TABRECTA's twice-daily regimen, both drugs have similar efficacy profiles, making physician and patient preference an important differentiator. Additionally, broader competition from next-generation MET inhibitors and combination therapies in clinical trials could impact TEPMETKO's long-term market position. Regulatory approvals and market access play a crucial role in TEPMETKO's adoption. The drug has been approved in multiple regions, including the U.S., Europe, and Japan, but reimbursement and pricing strategies vary by market. Payer policies, along with the cost-benefit analysis of MET inhibitors compared to other targeted therapies, influence prescription trends. Furthermore, real-world evidence and post-marketing studies will be critical in demonstrating TEPMETKO's sustained effectiveness and safety, which could support expanded indications and increased market penetration. Looking ahead, the MET inhibitor market is expected to grow with advances in biomarker-driven therapy, further refining patient selection. TEPMETKO's success will depend on continued clinical development, potential label expansions, and strategic partnerships to strengthen its competitive edge. As new entrants emerge, Merck KGaA's ability to differentiate TEPMETKO through combination strategies or enhanced formulations may determine its long-term sustainability in this evolving landscape. Dive deeper to get more insight into TEPMETKO's strengths & weaknesses relative to competitors @ TEPMETKO Market Drug Report Table of Contents Related Reports Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market Insights, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast – 2034 report deliver an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical and forecasted epidemiology, as well as the market trends, market drivers, market barriers, and key NSCLC companies including Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, BieGene, AbbVie, Roche, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, BerGenBio, GlaxoSmithKline, Duality biologics, among others. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Pipeline Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Pipeline Insight – 2025 report provides comprehensive insights about the pipeline landscape, pipeline drug profiles, including clinical and non-clinical stage products, and the key non-small cell lung cancer companies, including BridgeBio Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Merck, BridgeBio Pharma, Abbvie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company BioNTech SE, Shenzhen TargetRx, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chong Kun Dang, Bristol Myers Squibb, Innovent Biologics, Xuanzhu Biopharmaceutical, Bayer, GeneScience Pharmaceuticals, InventisBio, Apollomics, Imugene, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pierre Fabre, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Surface Oncology, Inhibrx, Sinocelltech, Mirati Therapeutics, REVOLUTION Medicines, Yong Shun Technology Development, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Galecto Biotech, among others. C-MET Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market C-MET Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market Insights, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast – 2034 report deliver an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical and forecasted epidemiology, as well as the market trends, market drivers, market barriers, and key C-MET mNSCLC companies, including Novartis, Merck, EMD Serono, AbbVie, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Mythic Therapeutics, Apollomics, Johnson & Johnson Innovation, Haihe Biopharma, among others. C-MET Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Pipeline C-MET Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Pipeline Insight – 2025 report provides comprehensive insights about the pipeline landscape, pipeline drug profiles, including clinical and non-clinical stage products, and the key C-MET non-small cell lung cancer companies, including AbbVie, Janssen Research & Development, Beijing Pearl Biotechnology Limited Liability Company, Novartis, among others. About DelveInsight DelveInsight is a leading Business Consultant and Market Research firm focused exclusively on life sciences. It supports pharma companies by providing comprehensive end-to-end solutions to improve their performance. Get hassle-free access to all the healthcare and pharma market research reports through our subscription-based platform PharmDelve . Contact Us Shruti Thakur [email protected] +14699457679 Logo: SOURCE DelveInsight Business Research, LLP WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM? 440k+ Newsrooms & Influencers 9k+ Digital Media Outlets 270k+ Journalists Opted In GET STARTED

上市批准免疫疗法优先审批

2025-01-26

·小药说药

TAM受体家族的靶向治疗

关注小药说药，一起成长！前言 TYRO3、AXL（也称为UFO）和MERTK组成了TAM受体酪氨酸激酶（RTK）家族。TAM受体信号异常与一系列疾病有关，包括癌症、纤维化和病毒感染。实验证据表明，TAM受体在促进凋亡细胞的吞噬作用、防止高反应性免疫反应以及调节血管完整性和血管通透性方面发挥着关键作用。此外，TAM受体也被称为磷脂酰丝氨酸病毒进入增强受体（PVEER），因为它们能够与病毒包膜上存在的磷脂酰丝氨酸（PtdSer）相互作用，促进病毒进入。在癌症中，TAM受体激活促进细胞增殖和转移，参与上皮-间充质转化（EMT），维持干细胞表型、免疫调节、血管生成以及对传统和靶向治疗的抵抗。与许多RTK不同，TAM受体很少发生突变，受体活性的失调主要是由于其微环境的基因扩增或激活，使其成为理想的治疗靶点，而没有产生突变驱动的耐药性的风险。大多数TAM受体抑制剂，包括小分子和生物制剂，主要开发用于靶向或破坏AXL信号通路。临床上，AXL抑制剂正在各种肿瘤适应症进行多项临床试验，展现出极具潜力的应用前景。 TAM受体家族的结构和信号通路与许多其他跨膜RTK类似，TAM受体具有一个细胞外结构域，该结构域由两个免疫球蛋白结构域组成，这两个结构域对配体结合至关重要，随后是两个重复的III型纤连蛋白。细胞内激酶结构域在三种受体之间高度保守，它们都具有该RTKs家族特有的KWIAIES序列。 TAM受体主要与两种配体相互作用，即生长停滞特异性蛋白6（GAS6）和维生素K依赖性蛋白S1（PROS1）。AXL受体和GAS6之间1:1相互作用导致AXL和GAS6的同源二聚体形成，进而导致细胞内催化结构域的激活。TAM受体催化结构域的自身磷酸化促进与磷脂酰肌醇3-激酶（PI3K）的p85亚基、SRC家族成员和生长因子受体结合蛋白2（GRB2）的结合，导致MEK–ERK信号的激活。 TAM受体的生理功能 TAM受体在各种细胞过程中具有重要的生理作用，如胎儿发育和成人组织稳态。它们作为免疫反应的负调节因子发挥作用，并促进凋亡细胞的吞噬清除。TAM受体信号传导对于保存血管完整性同样至关重要。此外，TAM受体的异常激活会导致免疫、血管系统和男性生殖系统的异常。免疫反应功能免疫系统中TAM受体的表达定位于活化的树突状细胞、巨噬细胞、髓系抑制细胞和自然杀伤细胞，所有这些都是先天免疫反应的重要调节因子。TAM受体及其配体在调节免疫反应的大小和强度以及维持先天和适应性免疫途径的复杂稳态方面发挥着重要作用。此外，病毒可以通过与GAS6或PROS1的结合进入宿主细胞。在受体-配体结合和激活后，TAM受体通过与干扰素-α/β受体-STAT通路相互作用来抑制免疫反应。该途径导致SOCS1和SOCS3介导的Toll样受体（TLR）信号传导的抑制和炎症反应的抑制，帮助病毒逃避免疫监测。凋亡细胞的吞噬清除 TAM受体有助于吞噬作用和清除各种细胞类型中的细胞碎片，以维持组织稳态，从而避免过度和致病性炎症反应。例如，视网膜中光感受器外段的消除通常由表达MERTK的吞噬性视网膜色素上皮进行。缺乏MERTK的视网膜色素上皮细胞无法清除有毒碎片，由此产生的过度活跃的炎症反应导致光感受器死亡、视网膜变性，最终导致失明。维持血管功能由于GAS6和PROS1对内皮细胞和血小板的生长和维持至关重要，TAM受体信号传导与维持血管完整性和通透性有关。有报道指出，AXL通过与VEGFA的相互作用以及通过PI3K和AKT的信号传导来促进血管生长。AXL的缺失会导致体外和体内血管形成受损，而抑制MERTK或TYRO3只会产生轻微效果。癌症中的TAM受体信号已有充分的研究证明，癌症生长和发展过程中TAM受体信号异常，这些异常激活的TAM受体可在缺氧和营养缺乏期间驱动转移，促进治疗耐药性，并促进癌细胞存活。 AXL 多项研究表明，在不同组织学来源的癌症中，AXL的表达失调，GAS6–AXL信号传导与各种促肿瘤功能相关。例如，在缺氧条件下，癌细胞分泌缺氧诱导型转录因子1和2（HIF1和HIF2），以激活AXL并促进低氧适应。 AXL促进上皮-间质转化，这是一种关键的癌症转移起始事件，可促进肿瘤细胞的迁移和侵袭能力。内源性AXL信号传导正向调节EMT所需的转录因子，包括TWIST、ZEB1、ZEB2和SLUG，还促进N-钙粘蛋白的表达和E-钙粘蛋白下调以促进EMT。此外，AXL可以促进其他关键致癌途径的激活，如MET、SRC和Ras刺激的致癌途径，以促进EMT。此外，AXL表达升高通常与血液学肿瘤和实体瘤的治疗耐药性有关。具体而言，AXL信号被认为通过激活AKT和ERK信号通路介导对EGFR抑制剂西妥昔单抗和放疗的耐药性，并通过调节c-ABL的活性来减少肿瘤细胞凋亡。此外，在对各种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂具有耐药性的癌症中经常观察到AXL信号的上调。 MERTK 与在癌症中普遍表达的AXL不同，MERTK表达升高与血液学癌症特别相关。MERTK在血液学癌症中的表达对于逃避先天免疫监测很重要，从而促进恶性肿瘤的生长和增殖，如急性淋巴细胞白血病和急性髓细胞白血病（AML）。30%的儿童B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病出现MERTK异常表达。在胶质母细胞瘤中，抑制MERTK导致CD206+抗炎M2样巨噬细胞减少。尽管单独的这种作用不足以延长生存期，但在胶质母细胞瘤动物模型中，MERTK抑制与放疗的结合导致肿瘤生长显著减少，M2样巨噬细胞向M1样巨噬细胞极化转变，并增强促炎免疫反应。 TYRO3 TYRO3在多种恶性肿瘤中表达升高，如鳞状细胞癌、肺癌、前列腺癌、甲状腺癌、神经鞘瘤和多发性骨髓瘤，但其功能作用和临床相关性尚不清楚。TYRO3在调节骨稳态方面显示出其独特的生物活性。TYRO3调节破骨细胞的分化和功能，破骨细胞在正常骨重塑中负责骨吸收。然而，异常的TYRO3信号传导会使病理状况恶化，包括骨质疏松症和骨转移的发展。这些发现表明，TYRO3可能是恢复骨动力学和防止癌症骨转移的一个有前途的治疗靶点。非癌症疾病中的TAM受体除了癌症之外，异常的TAM受体信号传导通常是纤维化、自身免疫性疾病和病毒感染等疾病的重要原因。纤维化组织纤维化的特征是慢性炎症和组织损伤的导致的细胞外基质（ECM）和基质元素的广泛积累。TAM受体家族在纤维化疾病的组织重塑过程中起着关键作用。在肝硬化中，AXL信号传导被激活以诱导SLUG的转录，SLUG是EMT的关键调节因子。此外，AXL与TGF-β相互作用，以SMAD3依赖的方式促进α-平滑肌肌动蛋白（α-SMA）、胶原和基质金属蛋白酶（MMPs）的沉积。自身免疫性疾病自身免疫性疾病的病理学多种多样且极其复杂。然而，大多数临床表现与异常免疫复合物和自身抗体的产生有关。自身免疫性疾病会促进慢性炎症反应，导致正常组织的破坏。TAM受体在免疫调节中的一个重要作用是清除凋亡细胞，这主要由MERTK信号驱动。在许多自身免疫性疾病中发现MERTK信号传导的丧失，包括系统性红斑狼疮和多发性硬化症。髓磷脂是中枢神经系统的关键组成部分，其破坏是多发性硬化症的标志。MERTK在调节小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞的髓鞘吞噬作用中发挥重要作用，小胶质细胞是参与多发性硬化症病理的关键免疫细胞。小胶质细胞活化和随后的髓鞘再形成需要MERTK。考虑到这些发现，激活MERTK是多发性硬化症的一种很有前途的治疗途径，有可能减轻髓鞘吞噬作用，增强碎片清除率，减少神经炎症。病毒进入在整个进化过程中，病毒已经获得了躲避先天免疫反应以成功进入宿主的能力。它们的逃避机制之一是病毒粒子能够包裹在包括宿主细胞质膜的脂质双层中，导致病毒吞噬和释放。这些包膜病毒使用PVEER，包括AXL、MER和TYRO3，进入人类宿主细胞。暴露于PtdSer的包膜病毒可能会在Gla结构域上与GAS6或PROS1形成复合物，从而使它们能够利用所有三种TAM受体进入细胞。除此机制外，凋亡模拟是包膜病毒以“免疫沉默”方式进入宿主细胞的另一种策略。表达PtdSer的病毒与表达TAM受体的宿主细胞对接，促进内吞吞噬。对接后，病毒还可以通过促进TAM受体介导的TLR信号传导抑制来抑制炎症反应，使其能够逃避免疫监测。严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型（SARS-CoV-2）通过与血管紧张素转换酶2（ACE2）结合进入宿主细胞。有研究发现，当ACE2水平较低时，GAS6–AXL受体复合物的存在可以增强SARS-CoV-2的感染。因此，破坏GAS6–AXL–PtdSer复合物可能是减轻SARS-CoV-2感染严重程度的一种潜在治疗方法。 TAM受体抑制剂药物的开发 TAM受体抑制剂在癌症和非癌症疾病的临床前和临床研究中显示出有希望的结果。强有力的证据表明，TAM受体抑制剂与标准护理治疗相结合，可以促进抗肿瘤免疫反应，减少炎症，改善对癌症治疗的反应。随着对TAM受体信号传导的日益了解和新药物的开发，TAM受体抑制剂代表了一种治疗广泛疾病的有前景的方法。小分子抑制剂大多数TAM受体抑制剂是化小分子，旨在干扰位于细胞内激酶结构域上的ATP结合部分。针对TAM受体的多种小分子正在临床前和临床开发中。 Bemcentinib（BGB324）是一种处于临床阶段的AXL抑制剂，其与MERTK和TYRO3相比对AXL具有50倍至100倍的选择性。在卵巢癌、胶质母细胞瘤、间皮瘤、胰腺癌、乳腺癌和肺癌的临床前模型中验证了Bemcentinib的疗效。Bemcentinib目前是临床开发中最领先的AXL抑制剂之一，在NSCLC、TNBC和黑色素瘤（NCT03184571、NCT02872259、NCT03184558）中有多个I/II期临床研究。 RXDX-106是一种泛TAM抑制剂，具有缓慢的解离速率以提高其效力。RXDX-106对小鼠模型中显示出增强的抗肿瘤作用。然而，2018年3月开始的RXDX-106的1期研究（NCT03454243）于2019年被申办方终止。 MRX-2843是一种MERTK抑制剂，其也以高效力抑制FLT3。与前几代化合物相比，MRX-2843显示出改善的口服生物利用度、增强的溶解度、药物代谢和药代动力学特性。在动物模型中，它表现出强大的抗癌活性，并降低了T细胞上PD-1的表达，导致免疫介导的治疗活性。目前其正在进行多项临床试验，以研究在复发/难治性转移性实体瘤（NCT03510104）、多种亚型急性白血病（NCT04872478、NCT04946890）以及与EGFR抑制剂奥西替尼联合治疗NSCLC（NCT04762199）中的疗效。 Sitravatinib（MGCD516）抑制TAM受体家族的所有成员。该分子在肾细胞癌、NSCLC、肉瘤和乳腺癌的临床前模型中显示出强大的抗肿瘤功效。Sitravatinib 症在30多项针对各种实体瘤类型的临床试验中进行评估，包括与抗PD-1抗体和化疗的联合治疗（NCT04921358，NCT05461794）。 ONO-7475是AXL和MERTK的抑制剂。在表达AXL、EGFR突变的NSCLC的临床前模型中，ONO-7475治疗使细胞对EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂敏感，导致肿瘤消退和肿瘤生长延迟。然而，在ONO-7475治疗急性白血病患者的临床试验中，招募被终止（NCT03176277）。生物药近年来，TAM受体靶向疗法，包括生物制品和其他新型治疗策略，取得了重大进展，为治疗各种癌症类型提供了有前景的分子。 Batiraxcept（AVB-S6-500）是一种工程化的超高亲和力sAXL诱饵受体。与野生型AXL受体相比，其对GAS6的结合亲和力提高了320倍。batiraxcept在卵巢癌、AML、乳腺癌、肾癌和胰腺癌的临床前模型中显示出显著的抗肿瘤活性。在一项Ib期临床试验中，batiraxcept与紫杉醇联合用药的患者显示出34.8%的总有效率，有两例完全缓解（NCT03639246）。然而，batiraxcept与紫杉醇联合的III期研究结果并未显示出治疗效果的显著改善（NCT4729608）。目前，该分子正在其他癌症类型中进行探索，包括肾透明细胞癌（NCT04300140）和胰腺癌（NCT04983407）。 Tilvestamab是一种完全人源化的AXL阻断抗体，主要结合AXL受体，与MERTK或TYRO3仅显示微弱结合。在功能上，Tilvestamab阻断GAS6与AXL的结合，并在AML、NSCLC、胰腺癌和肾癌模型中表现出抗肿瘤活性。Tilvestamab正在一项I期临床试验中测试对复发性、对铂耐药的高级别浆液性卵巢癌的疗效（NCT04893551）。 Enapotamab vedotin（HuMax-AXL-ADC）是一种抗体偶联药物，包括与auristatin E偶联的抗AXL抗体，用于靶向消除表达AXL的癌细胞。2020年其完成了一项I/II期剂量递增试验（NCT02988817），用于评估HuMax AXL ADC在实体瘤患者中的安全性和抗肿瘤活性。不幸的是，由于缺乏足够的临床疗效，该方案被终止。 Mecbotamab vedotin（CAB-AXL-ADC）是另一种靶向表达AXL的肿瘤细胞的抗体偶联药物。其正在进行三项II期临床研究，评估CAB-AXL-ADC作为单一疗法或与PD-1抑制剂联合治疗NSCLC、卵巢癌和其他实体瘤的安全性和有效性（NCT04681131、NCT03425279、NCT04918186）。小结近年来，我们在理解TAM受体在正常组织稳态和疾病状态中的作用方面取得了重大进展。令人信服的临床前研究已经促进开发出针对TAM受体家族的治疗药物，包括AXL和MERTK特异性抑制剂。这些分子中的许多正在临床研究中显示出有希望的结果。在接下来的几年中，期待这些分子的临床获得成功，能够早日造福疾病患者。参考文献： 1. Therapeutic targeting of the functionally elusive TAM receptor family. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023 Dec 13. 公众号内回复“ADC”或扫描下方图片中的二维码免费下载《抗体偶联药物：从基础到临床》的PDF格式电子书！公众号已建立“小药说药专业交流群”微信行业交流群以及读者交流群，扫描下方小编二维码加入，入行业群请主动告知姓名、工作单位和职务。

2024-12-29

·小药说药

关于ADC治疗窗口的几个问题

关注小药说药，一起成长！前言抗体药物偶联物（ADC）疗法近几十年来发展迅速，目前全球已有16种产品获得批准，140多种ADC正在临床试验中。到2030年，ADC市场将达到150亿美元以上。ADC的基本原理：通过将单克隆抗体的特异性与有效小分子药物的细胞毒性相结合，ADC可以精确地向肿瘤输送毒素，同时保留正常组织，增加药物的治疗窗口。临床前数据表明，将药物与抗体偶联可降低药物的最小有效剂量（MED）并增加药物的最大耐受剂量（MTD）。但越来越多的临床证据表明，ADC的耐受剂量与相关小分子的耐受剂量没有显著差异。在细胞毒素含量标准化后，ADC和人体中相应小分子的MTD大致相同。因此，目前人们对于ADC治疗窗口的一般理解可能是是不准确的。这里我们探讨关于ADC治疗窗口的几个问题，希望能够提供一些助益，有助于改进下一代ADC的设计。 ADC真的能实现比小分子更高的MTD吗？药物的MTD是没有严重副作用（剂量限制性毒性）的最高耐受剂量。过去，确定MTD是第一阶段肿瘤试验的主要目标。最近，特别是对于新的靶向药物（包括ADC），重点放在确定推荐的2期剂量（RP2D），它能更好地观察多个治疗周期后出现的慢性毒性和某些2级副作用。上图总结了10个已批准ADC药物的MTD/RP2D值，通过将ADC和小分子剂量转换为共同单位后，可以标准化分子量和药物抗体比，更准确地比较ADC与有效载荷小分子的治疗窗口。结果很明显，ADC并没有显著提高其有效载荷的MTD，这一认识可能有助于深入了解该领域的几个现有的观察结果：（1）具有共同有效载荷-连接子的ADC通常会遇到类似的MTD，因为有效载荷相关的平台毒性，与靶抗原无关。这突出表明，大多数非靶向不良事件与抗体无关。（2）正常组织中抗体靶向结合产生的靶向非肿瘤毒性是比较常见的。在这种情况下，MTD可能低于使用相同有效载荷-连接子的其他ADC。例如，Dato DXd（靶向TROP2的DAR4 DXd ADC）未能达到与其他含有DXd的ADC（T-DXd、HER3-DXd、B7H3-DXd和CDH6-DXd）相同的细胞毒素剂量，这可能是由于与正常组织中TROP2表达引起的药物相关不良事件（皮疹、口炎和粘膜炎）。在用其他TROP2 ADC治疗的患者中也观察到对皮肤和口腔粘膜的类似毒性。（3）通过设计限制与正常组织结合的工程化ADC（例如，CX-2009、CX-2029、BA3011、BA3021）与具有相同有效载荷-连接子的常规ADC相比，并没有改善MTD。（4）在一些情况下，降低ADC的DAR会导致耐受ADC剂量的成比例增加，但在细胞毒素量标准化后几乎没有改善。例如，与其他DAR4 MMAE ADC相比，ALT-P7（DAR2 MMAE ADC）具有类似的MTD。相应地，B7H3 DXd（DAR4）与其他DAR8 DXd ADC没有区别。虽然有点令人惊讶，ADC之前被广泛地认为可以拓宽其有效载荷的治疗窗口，但从临床数据可以清楚地看出，MTD没有增加。这也得到了近40个活跃ADC的临床数据的证实。为什么有效载荷和ADC的MTD没有显著变化？ ADC未能提高其有效载荷MTD的原因仍不明确。一种可能的解释在于抗体在保护有效载荷免受清除和代谢中所起的关键作用。有效载荷“全剂量”附着在抗体上，直到ADC靶向和非靶向介导的细胞摄取并分解代谢释放自由有效载荷或有效载荷代谢物，而这些代谢物又通过传统的小分子途径被清除。 ADC有效载荷-连接子也可以在血浆或肿瘤微环境中进行细胞外裂解，从而在循环中提供有效载荷的直接来源，而无需内吞。虽然较新的ADC使用比前几代更稳定的连接子，但一些有效的ADC（包括批准的ADC）是使用在血浆中半衰期相对较短的连接子构建的。此外，通过硫醇马来酰亚胺化学制备的ADC，包括目前批准或正在开发的大多数ADC，可以使整个有效载荷-连接子从抗体中解偶联，这一过程称为逆Michael反应。例如，T-DXd和其他deruxtecan ADC、vedotin ADC以及许多正在开发中的ADC。对于这些ADC，高达50%-75%的有效载荷-连接子在大约7天后被解偶联，解偶联有效载荷-连接子迅速与含硫醇的血浆分子（主要是白蛋白）反应，形成新的偶联物。白蛋白在人类中有很长的半衰期，因此，有效载荷不会立即释放到循环中，而是保持在血液中，直到白蛋白结合物被分解。有效载荷-连接子从ADC转移到白蛋白这个过程可能通过白蛋白偶联物的非特异性沉积和增加有效载荷半衰期而产生某些毒性。另一方面，它也可能通过白蛋白偶联物直接被肿瘤吸收从而有助于抗肿瘤效果。然而，由于临床前模型中白蛋白的生物学特性与人的非常不同，因此对白蛋白在有效载荷-连接子解偶联相关的毒性和功效中作用的评估仍然难以实现。 ADC的疗效是否比其有效载荷有所提高？迄今为止批准的14个ADC证明了ADC治疗方法的重要性，DESTINY-Breast03和DESTINY-Breast04的最新数据突出了T-DXd改变乳腺癌治疗模式的潜力。另一方面，100多个终止的ADC项目也显示了选择抗体、靶点、有效载荷-连接子、DAR和适应症的正确组合的挑战。在20世纪70年代，FDA癌症药物批准主要基于客观反应率（ORR），但从20世纪80年代初起，批准基于更直接的临床疗效证据，包括无进展生存率（PFS）和总生存率（OS）的改善。因为ORR直接归因于药物效应，ORR也是支持FDA加速批准的最常见的替代终点。考虑到ORR通常被用作早期ADC试验的主要终点，这里比较了用于治疗类似患者群体时小分子和ADC的ORR。到目前为止，还没有直接的头对头随机临床试验将ADC与其有效载荷进行比较。最接近的例子是DESTINY-Gastric01试验中的T-DXd在医生选择的组中使用伊立替康（与DXd相同药物类别的拓扑异构酶I抑制剂）治疗：T-DXd治疗组的ORR为42%，而医生选择组为12.5%。有足够的临床数据可以得出结论，多个ADC显示出比相关小分子疗法更好的ORR。哪些机制有助于ADC的成功？小分子的药代动力学（PK）通过与抗体偶联而发生根本性改变。ADC延长了细胞毒素的半衰期，包括保护其免受肾脏清除。另一方面，ADC面临着与其他生物制剂类似的问题，这些包括显著的非肿瘤靶向摄取和非特异性清除，毛细血管壁有限的外渗，由于肿瘤间质流体压力增加而导致肿瘤内低扩散，以及“结合位点屏障”现象（抗体结合到其靶点的速度快于其扩散速度，阻止了更深的渗透）。对于单克隆抗体，这些障碍中的一些可以通过增加剂量来克服，但这种策略不适用于ADC，因为偶联的细胞毒素决定了MTD。事实上，据报道，只有不到1%的ADC到达人体肿瘤，其余的ADC可能会造成不必要的毒性。因此，单用ADC肿瘤靶向可能无法解释相对于相关小分子的疗效提高。因此，ADC可能依赖于其他机制来提高效率，例如有效地延长了循环中有效载荷的释放。抗原表达和ADC特性影响ADC PK和分解代谢，调节有效载荷释放的速率和位置，进而影响游离有效载荷的血浆水平和肿瘤局部浓度。其中，有效载荷旁观者活性的程度、偶联化学和连接子类型是关键的设计参数。此外，来自不同肿瘤抗原表达水平患者的近期临床结果支持了循环有效载荷可产生基线抗肿瘤效应的观点。例如，许多ADC在肿瘤抗原低表达或阴性的患者中显示出疗效。抗体部分可提高由游离细胞毒素提供的基线活性效力，特别是在抗原高表达的肿瘤中。通过比较脑转移的HER2+乳腺癌患者中trastuzumab、T-DM1和T-DXd的试验数据发现，在DESTINY-Breast03的亚组分析中，T-DXd和T-DM1的颅内ORR分别为64%和33%，而在单独试验中，trastuzumab没有产生客观反应。完整的血脑屏障（BBB）可阻止抗体渗透，但不会限制小分子，这取决于它们的物理化学性质。与trastuzumab相比，T-DXd（易渗透）和T-DM1（不易渗透）的循环中细胞毒性分解代谢物的倾向性可能为观察到的抗脑转移活性差异提供最佳解释。小结 ADC的成功证明了将正确的靶点、抗体、偶联方式、DAR、连接子、有效载荷和疾病适应症结合起来可以产生显著的临床效益。然而，尽管存在广泛的多样性，目前的ADC并没有显著增加其有效载荷在多种肿瘤疾病状态下的MTD。因此，更好地理解临床活性ADC的作用机制，例如抗体靶向递送、循环中持续的游离药物浓度、白蛋白转移或多种机制的组合、以及ADC结构成分及其PK/PD之间的相互关系对于设计下一代ADC非常重要。参考文献： 1.The therapeutic window of antibody drug conjugates: A dogma in need of revision. Cancer Cell.2022 Oct 10;S1535-6108(22)00445-7 公众号内回复“ADC”或扫描下方图片中的二维码免费下载《抗体偶联药物：从基础到临床》的PDF格式电子书！公众号已建立“小药说药专业交流群”微信行业交流群以及读者交流群，扫描下方小编二维码加入，入行业群请主动告知姓名、工作单位和职务。

抗体药物偶联物临床2期临床1期临床结果

100 项与 Mecbotamab vedotin 相关的药物交易

登录后查看更多信息

研发状态

10 条进展最快的记录,

后查看更多信息

适应症	最高研发状态	国家/地区	公司	日期
铂耐药性卵巢癌	临床2期	美国	BioAtla, Inc.	2022-05-03
铂耐药性卵巢癌	临床2期	美国	AstraZeneca PLC	2022-05-03
铂耐药性卵巢癌	临床2期	加拿大	BioAtla, Inc.	2022-05-03
铂耐药性卵巢癌	临床2期	加拿大	AstraZeneca PLC	2022-05-03
转移性非小细胞肺癌	临床2期	美国	BioAtla, Inc.	2021-03-17
转移性非小细胞肺癌	临床2期	希腊	BioAtla, Inc.	2021-03-17
转移性非小细胞肺癌	临床2期	中国香港	BioAtla, Inc.	2021-03-17
转移性非小细胞肺癌	临床2期	意大利	BioAtla, Inc.	2021-03-17
转移性非小细胞肺癌	临床2期	波兰	BioAtla, Inc.	2021-03-17
转移性非小细胞肺癌	临床2期	西班牙	BioAtla, Inc.	2021-03-17

登录后查看更多信息

临床结果

适应症

分期

评价

查看全部结果

研究	分期	人群特征	评价人数	分组	结果	评价	发布日期


NCT04681131 (ESMO_ELCC2025)	临床2期	非小细胞肺癌 KRAS mutations	113	Mecbotamab vedotin (Mec-V)	鹹鹹窪餘獵憲鑰糧簾襯(鹹選艱醖壓淵獵蓋壓願) = 繭齋膚鏇艱膚壓遞糧艱簾顧壓餘艱遞膚窪廠襯 (繭憲構構醖鬱窪製廠範 ) 更多	积极	2025-03-26
				Mecbotamab vedotin (Mec-V) + Nivolumab	鹹鹹窪餘獵憲鑰糧簾襯(鹹選艱醖壓淵獵蓋壓願) = 窪願積餘積簾糧鏇範鬱簾顧壓餘艱遞膚窪廠襯 (繭憲構構醖鬱窪製廠範 ) 更多
NCT03425279 (ESMO_SRC2024) 人工标引	临床2期	肉瘤	113	BA3011BA3011 monotherapy	選鏇襯膚構艱壓鬱網淵(夢積鏇窪衊範膚壓糧鹹) = The most common TEAEs of special interest among monotherapy pts were peripheral neuropathy (32.2%), neutropenia (25.3%), and abnormal liver function tests (20.7%). 範製簾範艱範衊壓齋範 (鹽糧鹽窪鹹願範鏇網簾 ) 更多	积极	2024-03-14
				BA3011 + nivolumab
NCT04681131 (GlobeNewswire) 人工标引	临床2期	非小细胞肺癌 AXL	40	BA3011	築選願艱鏇選壓餘簾憲(壓鬱鏇淵鏇糧繭廠遞鏇) = 願遞淵餘構襯積壓廠窪製築積襯廠鏇遞鏇顧繭 (衊淵願繭醖襯蓋鹽築繭 ) 更多	积极	2023-12-05
NCT03425279 (PRNewswire) 人工标引	临床2期	肉瘤 \| 非小细胞肺癌	17	Mecbotamab vedotin (先前 PD-1/L1、EGFR 或 ALK 抑制剂治疗失败的 AXL 阳性 NSCLC 患者)	鏇窪壓鹽蓋鏇鑰艱糧膚(鑰憲齋鹽繭遞餘築衊糧) = 膚窪觸鏇觸範鬱鏇鏇鹹廠築齋膚顧鹹餘膚壓遞 (糧淵顧艱憲蓋顧獵鑰壓 ) 更多	积极	2022-09-12
				Mecbotamab vedotin (多形性肉瘤)	繭衊艱築鑰簾鏇廠網蓋(簾築憲願襯鑰壓網鏇廠) = 餘範觸壓廠繭網網淵製蓋範觸餘鹽齋鏇繭壓衊 (簾壓築鹽願範製構積膚 ) 更多