Ipsen Biopharm Ltd.

Despite sharing ∼ 43 % sequence identity and structurally similar individual domains, botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) serotypes A and E have differences in their properties and domain positioning. BoNT/E has a faster onset of action than BoNT/A. This difference is proposed to be due to conformational differences between BoNT/E and the other BoNT serotypes. Where most serotypes have the light chain (LC) and binding domain (BD) on opposite sides of the translocation domain (TD), BoNT/E forms a more compact shape with direct interactions between residues of the LC and BD. To elucidate the structural basis for the different properties of BoNT/A and BoNT/E, biophysical studies including molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, circular dichroism (CD) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were applied to BoNT/A, for comparison against previous work on BoNT/E. MD simulationsat six pH values across the toxin's activation barrier (pH ∼ 5.5), followed by one extra repeat for the pH values below 5.5, revealed a rare event at pH 5 and 5.5 where interactions between a previously identified switch region of BoNT/Aand the BD were lost.This hintedat an increased freedom of movement, thus allowing the region to change from α-helical to a β-hairpin. In good agreement with previous work, CD showed a gradual and small loss of helicity as the pH decreased below pH 5.5, stabilising at pH 4.5. Combined with the relative scarcity of structural changes observed by MD in the switch region required for activity, these results may explain the slower onset of action for BoNT/A compared to BoNT/E.

Multi-attribute methods employing mass spectrometry are applied throughout the biopharmaceutical industry for product and process characterization purposes but are not yet widely accepted as a method for batch release and stability testing under the good manufacturing practice (GMP) regime, due to limited experience and level of comfort with the technical, compliance and regulatory aspects of its implementation at quality control (QC) laboratories. This article is the second part of a two-tiered publication aiming at providing guidance for implementation of the multi-attribute method by peptide mapping liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (MAM) in a QC laboratory. The first part [1] focuses on technical considerations, while this second part provides considerations related to GMP compliance and regulatory aspects. This publication has been prepared by a group of industry experts representing 14 globally acting major biotechnology companies under the umbrella of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) Manufacturing & Quality Expert Group (MQEG).

Multi-attribute methods employing mass spectrometry are applied throughout the biopharmaceutical industry for product and process characterization purposes but are not yet widely accepted as a method for batch release and stability testing under good manufacturing practice (GMP) due to limited experience and level of comfort with the technical, compliance and regulatory aspects of its implementation at quality control (QC) laboratories. Here, current literature related to the development and application of the multi-attribute method by peptide mapping liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (MAM) is compiled with the aim of providing guidance for the implementation of MAM in a QC laboratory. This article, focusing on technical considerations, is the first part of a two-tiered publication, whereby the second part will focus on GMP compliance and regulatory aspects. This publication has been prepared by a group of industry experts representing 14 globally acting major biotechnology companies under the umbrella of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) Manufacturing & Quality Expert Group (MQEG).