BeiGene (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

We report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from the ROSEWOOD trial (NCT03332017), which demonstrated superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile with zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab (ZO) versus obinutuzumab (O) in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL).

PROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires at baseline and subsequently every 12 weeks. All QLQ-C30 domains and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) scores were analyzed descriptively. At the key clinical timepoints (weeks 12 and 24), a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was used to evaluate the key PRO endpoints, including global health status, physical and role functioning, and symptoms of fatigue, pain, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting. Clinically meaningful change was defined as a ≥ 5-point mean difference from baseline and between the ZO and O arms.

Patients were randomized to ZO (n = 145) or O (n = 72). By week 48, descriptive analysis results indicated that patients in the ZO arm demonstrated improved outcomes in role functioning and fatigue and nausea/vomiting symptoms, compared with those in the O arm. Both groups experienced improvements in pain symptoms. EQ-5D-5L VAS scores showed no observable differences between treatment arms through week 48. MMRM analysis revealed that the global health status/quality of life of patients treated with ZO improved, as did fatigue, at week 12. At week 24, patients in the ZO arm experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in role functioning, pain, and fatigue.

In patients with R/R FL, ZO was associated with improved PROs compared with O. These findings suggest that zanubrutinib contributed clinically meaningful benefits to patient HRQoL when added to obinutuzumab.

The ROSEWOOD trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (BGB-3111-212; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03332017).

First-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy alone in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC) at the interim analysis of the phase III RATIONALE-307 trial. We present the final analysis of this trial.

Patients with treatment-naive, stage IIIB/IV, sq-NSCLC were randomized (1 : 1: 1) to 21-day cycles of i.v.: tislelizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm A); tislelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm B); or paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm C). The primary endpoint was independent review committee-assessed PFS; overall survival was a secondary endpoint.

In total, 360 patients were randomized; 355 received treatment. At the final analysis (median study follow-up: 16.7 months), tislelizumab plus chemotherapy had a manageable safety profile, consistent with that at the interim analysis. Improvement in PFS was maintained for arms A and B versus C {hazard ratio (HR) 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.62] and 0.43 (95% CI 0.31-0.60), respectively}. Overall survival HRs for arms A and B versus C were 0.68 (95% CI 0.46-1.01) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.50-1.12), respectively.

The RATIONALE-307 final analysis demonstrated superior clinical benefit with addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy, and a manageable safety profile, as first-line treatment of advanced sq-NSCLC.

The purpose of this study was to report an updated, final analysis with longer follow-up for the open-label phase III RATIONALE-304 study of first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC).

Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV nsq-NSCLC were randomized (2 : 1) to 4-6 cycles of tislelizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy and pemetrexed every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance tislelizumab and pemetrexed, or platinum-based chemotherapy and pemetrexed alone every 3 weeks followed by maintenance pemetrexed. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS_IRC). Overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability were secondary endpoints.

Overall, 334 patients were randomized (tislelizumab plus chemotherapy: n = 223; chemotherapy: n = 111). At final analysis (median follow-up 16.1 months), safety/tolerability profiles in both arms were consistent with the interim analysis. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate prolongation of PFS_IRC versus chemotherapy alone {stratified hazard ratio (HR) 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.86]; median PFS_IRC 9.8 months (95% CI 8.9-11.7 months) versus 7.6 months (95% CI 5.6-8.0 months), respectively}. OS stratified HR for tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy was 0.90 (95% CI 0.63-1.28), with median OS of 21.4 months (95% CI 17.7 months-not estimable) versus 21.3 months (95% CI 15.6 months-not estimable), respectively. At a subsequent ad hoc analysis (median follow-up 19.3 months), OS HR between arms was 0.85 (95% CI 0.63-1.14); when adjusted for crossover using the two-stage method, the OS HR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.48-0.96).

After longer follow-up, first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate a manageable safety profile and a favorable PFS benefit over chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced/metastatic nsq-NSCLC.