Cositecan

This review covers the preclinical and clinical activity of the novel camptothecin analog, karenitecin, in melanoma.

While the camptothecins are widely used antitumor agents that inhibit topoisomerase I, their utility is limited by instability, high interpatient variability and the development of drug resistance. Karenitecin was rationally designed to overcome these limitations. The authors review the data on karenitecin in preclinical models and in clinical trials in melanoma using studies published in Medline and reports presented at AACR and ASCO.

Karenitecin shows activity in melanoma, both as a single agent and in combination. In adverse prognostic factor melanoma, karenitecin showed prolonged disease stabilization in 34% of patients. Because preclinical studies suggested a synergistic interaction between karenitecin and HDAC inhibitors, a schedule-specific combination Phase I-II trial of valproic acid and karenitecin was carried out in heavily pretreated melanoma patients which showed a benefit rate in 47% patients with acceptable toxicity. The treatment for melanoma is in rapid transition and genomic profiling is now an integral part, and hence the optimal use of karenitecin in melanoma should be re-evaluated with regard to specific mutational status.

Organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) are important uptake transporters that can have a profound impact on the systemic pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and elimination of several drugs. Previous in vivo studies of the pharmacokinetics of the lipophilic camptothecin (CPT) analog gimatecan suggested that the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) B1 (P-glycoprotein) and/or ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein) inhibitors elacridar and pantoprazole could inhibit transporters other than ABCB1 and ABCG2. In this study, we tested the possible role of OATP1B1 in this interaction by screening a number of CPT analogs for their transport affinity by human OATP1B1 in vitro. In addition, the impact of several widely used ABCB1 and/or ABCG2 modulators on this OATP1B1-mediated transport was assessed. We identified two novel CPT anticancer drugs, gimatecan and BNP1350, as OATP1B1 substrates, whereas irinotecan, topotecan, and lurtotecan were not transported by OATP1B1. It is interesting to note that transport of 17beta-estradiol 17beta-d-glucuronide (control), gimatecan, and BNP1350 by OATP1B1 could be completely inhibited by the classic ABCB1 and/or ABCG2 inhibitors elacridar, valspodar, pantoprazole, and, to a lesser extent, zosuquidar and verapamil. Therefore, the effect of these ABCB1 and ABCG2 modulators on the plasma pharmacokinetics of gimatecan and BNP1350 (and possibly also other OATP1B1 substrates) may be partly because of inhibition of OATP1B1 besides inhibition of ABCB1 and/or ABCG2. The findings of this study suggest that OATP1B1 polymorphisms or coadministration with one of the ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitors could affect drug uptake, tissue distribution, and elimination of some CPT anticancer drugs, thereby modifying their efficacy and/or safety profile.