Influenza vaccine, adjuvanted(Novartis Pharma AG)

Delays in influenza vaccine delivery and administration can hinder vaccine coverage and protection. This study examines the differentials in distributing and administering adjuvanted trivalent (aTIV) and quadrivalent influenza vaccines (aQIV) to older adults in Italy's primary care setting and its potential impact on hospitalization risk over 5 epidemic seasons.

Using a primary care database, individuals aged ≥ 65 years were selected. The proportion of vaccine distribution to regional authorities and subsequent administration by GPs was estimated using census data. Using quantile (median) regression, we examined the relationship between velocities of vaccine distribution and administration (doses/week) and the incidence of hospitalizations.

Over the 5 influenza seasons, the velocity of distribution and administration of aTIV/aQIV ranged 341-833 and 152-270 median doses/week; no trend was yielded for the difference between these velocities (p = 0.189) or vaccine coverage (p = 0.142). An association was observed for each differential dose/week between distributed and administered vaccines and all-cause hospitalizations with a 10% increase in 2017-2018, 54% in 2018-2019, and 12% in 2020-2021 season.

These findings highlight the importance of minimizing the time lapse between vaccine distribution and administration to mitigate the impact of influenza and address factors that contribute to vaccination barriers.

This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the MF59®-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) versus standard-dose nonadjuvanted egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVe) for the prevention of influenza-related medical encounters (IRMEs), outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- and pneumonia-related hospitalizations during the 2019-2020 US influenza season among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition. A secondary objective evaluated the rVE of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing these outcomes among older adults with specific high-risk conditions. This retrospective cohort study included US adults ≥65 years of age vaccinated with aTIV or QIVe between August 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. Exposures, covariates, risk factors, and outcomes were captured from a linked dataset comprised of electronic health records (EHR) (Veradigm Network EHR) linked to insurance claims (Komodo Healthcare Map). A doubly robust approach was applied wherein multivariable-adjusted odds ratios were derived using inverse probability of treatment-weighted samples to calculate rVEs and 95 % confidence interval independently for individuals ≥1 high-risk condition and those with specific high-risk conditions. The study included 954,707 aTIV and 719,125 QIVe recipients. For all outcomes, aTIV was more effective than QIVe among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition (any IMRE: 23.6 % [20.9 %-26.1 %]), outpatient IRME: 23.3 % [20.4 %-26.1 %], and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations: 19.0 % [16.3 %-21.6 %]), during the 2019-2020 influenza season. Similarly, aTIV was more effective than QIVe at preventing outcomes among individuals with specific high-risk conditions except for body mass index ≥40. This study demonstrated higher effectiveness of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing any IRMEs, outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition.