PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd.

Patients with major burns can undergo temporary coverage while skin graft donor sites heal, where dermal templates have an emerging role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and resource utilisation in patients with major burns treated with a bilayer biodegradable synthetic matrix (NovoSorb BTM).

This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Adult Burn Unit with burns to at least 40 % TBSA who survived their acute admission. Patients treated from July 2017 to June 2022 with BTM were compared with patients with similar injuries treated using cadaveric allograft as temporising full thickness wound coverage between January 2013 and June 2017. Outcomes measures included number of operations, total operative time, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), cadaveric allograft and BTM use, and blood product use. Unadjusted comparisons were made with Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate linear regression was used to adjust for the effect of TBSA on each outcome.

Fifty-five patients were included (78 % male), 22 of whom were treated with BTM. We found no significant differences in age, sex, or TBSA between groups. One patient had half of the BTM removed due to infection and replaced with allograft. Patients treated with BTM had significantly less operative theatre time (median 1361.5 min [BTM] vs 1768 min [no BTM], P = 0.044). Number of operations, allograft use, hospital and ICU LOS, and blood product use were similar between groups. Adjusted models accounting for TBSA supported unadjusted models.

Resource utilisation and clinical outcomes were similar in patients with at least 40 % TBSA treated with BTM and those who were treated with allograft before the introduction of BTM. Patients treated with BTM had significantly less total operative time and no difference in number of operations, allograft use and ICU LOS.

NovoSorb^Ⓡ Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a relatively novel, biodegradable polyurethane-based dermal regeneration template. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term scarring outcomes and safety of BTM in patients who underwent dermal reconstruction involving ≥5% of the total body surface area.

This was a postmarket, multicenter, observational cohort study involving evaluation of long-term outcomes in patients treated with BTM. A total of 55 patients (35 from Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, and 20 from Victoria Adult Burns Service, The Alfred, Victoria) who underwent dermal repair with BTM between 2011 and 2017 were screened for inclusion in this study. All patients had BTM implanted for ≥18 months.

Fifteen eligible patients with a mean (SD) age of 49.1 (14.3) years completed study assessments. These patients had a total of 39 areas treated with BTM. Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, scar quality was reported to be good by both observers and patients, with a mean (SD) observer score across all lesions of 3.6 (1.2) and mean (SD) overall opinion of 3.8 (1.2) as well as a mean (SD) patient score of 3.5 (1.2) and overall opinion of 5.0 (2.2). No adverse events or adverse device effects were reported or identified.

The long-term scar quality is comparable to published studies. BTM is safe in the long term with no additional risks or adverse consequences being identified.

The aim of this article is to provide a brief overview of necrotising fasciitis, including causative factors, incidence, diagnosis and clinical outcomes. Various surgical treatment options are outlined, including methods of soft tissue reconstruction after wide excision of infected and necrotic tissues. The role of dermal matrices, including a synthetic biodegradable temporising matrix made of polyurethane, are described in terms of wound bed preparation, surgical application and clinical outcomes.