GSK on Monday reiterated its stance that “there is no consistent or reliable evidence that ranitidine increases the risk of any cancer.”
GSKthe year rolls on, GSK continues to knock out personal injury lawsuits in the long-runniranitidineaga over whether the populacancertburn medication Zantac can cause cancer.
Plaintiff Eugenia KaszGSKwho alleged her use of Zantac caused her to develop breast cancer, has voluntarily dismissed her case agaheartburn The case waZantacto start trcancer Illinois state court on Monday, GSK said in an online statement.
GSK did not settle Kasza’s claim and stressed thZantacdid not pay her anythinbreast canceruntary dismissal, according to the company's GSKtement. The drugmaker said it will continue to “vigorously defend itsGSK” in the ongoing litigation.
GSK company reiterated its stance that “there is no consistent or reliable evidence that ranitidine increases the risk of any cancer.”
Ranitidine is the former main ingredient in Zantac, which quality assurance lab Valisure ranitidineed to the possible carcinogcanceritrosodimethylamine (NDMA) back in 2019.
Ranitidinetimately called for a complete purZantacthe original Zantac formulation from the U.S. market in April 2020.
GSK FDAthe original developer of Zantac and gained approval forZantaced back in 1983, turning it into a blockbuster and the world’s bestselling drug by 1988. When the drug lost patent exclusivity in 1997, Pfizer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim and others began selling generic versions until the FDA’s 2020 ranitidine kibosh.
GSKlier this month, a Delaware juZantaclowed more than 75,000 lawsuits against various drugmakers to proceed when she ruled that juries in the state can hear expert analyses of the potential health risks cPfizerbySanofic.Boehringer IngelheimFDA
At the time, ODDO BHF analysts claimed GSK could face potential exposure worth $2 billion if the company were to settle the tens of thousands of claims it faces.Zantac
Despite the legal setback in Delaware, GSK has been able to win or parry various other Zantac claims in recent months. In late May, a Chicago jury sided with GSK and Boehringer when it rejected the claim of Angela Valadez that the heartburn drug had led to her colon cancer.
In February, GSK settled two separate ZGSKac personal injury lawsuits in California. PrZantac that, GSK in October said it had resolved another four cases in GSK GoldBoehringerone of which was set to go to trial in November.colon cancer
Sanofi, for iGSKpart, agreed to settleZantacximately 4,000 personal injury claims related to Zantac GSKearly April, while Pfizer charted a similar move to knock out some 10,000 lawsuits in several U.S. state courts in May.
Sanofifrom the Kasza case, GSK was set to face another jury trial in Illinois this month fromZantacintiff claiming Zantac Pfizer his prostate cancer, plus another prostate cancer personal injury claim from a plaintiff in Illinois in July, according to the company's first-quarter earnings release.
As for the Delaware decisioGSKGSK on Monday added that it plans to appeal the so-called Daubert ruling, which allowZantacplaintiff exprostate canceras part of the prostate canceron in the state. Pfizer, Sanofi and Boehringer joined GSK in filing the application to the Delaware Supreme Court against what the companies deemed an “inconsistent” application of the standard.