Elinogrel potassium

Here, we report the in vitro characterization of the P2Y12 receptor antagonist selatogrel (ACT-246475). Binding studies with radiolabeled selatogrel demonstrated that selatogrel is a competitive antagonist of ADP binding to the P2Y12 receptor with a fast onset of action. Consequently, selatogrel was confirmed to be a potent inhibitor of P2Y12-mediated intra-platelet signaling and ADP-induced platelet activation. Characterization of selatogrel in platelet-rich plasma in vitro demonstrated that the mode of anti-coagulation affected the anti-platelet potency. Specifically, in platelet-rich plasma containing physiological calcium concentration (anticoagulated with a direct thrombin inhibitor), selatogrel achieved half-maximal inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation at a 3-fold lower concentration than in conditions with low calcium concentration (anticoagulated with citrate). Furthermore, calcium-dependent reduction in selatogrel potency was observed in whole blood platelet aggregation using the VerifyNow™ system with a 3.7-fold potency loss in low calcium conditions. A comparable potency loss was also observed with the reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel. Furthermore, receptor-binding experiments using radiolabeled selatogrel confirmed a 3-fold lowering of selatogrel binding affinity to the P2Y12 receptor in low calcium conditions. In conclusion, our data suggest that in low calcium conditions (i.e., citrate-anticoagulated blood), there is a risk of underestimating the potency of reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists. To avoid overdosing, and a potential increase in bleeding risk, we propose that the ex vivo evaluation of reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists should be performed with platelet assay systems containing physiological calcium concentration.

The Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study found that ticagrelor plus aspirin (TA) was more effective than clopidogrel plus aspirin (CA), without an increase in the risk of massive bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data from other studies indicate that the conclusion is controversial with the results obtained by PLATO.

To investigate the efficacy and safety of TA, compared with CA, in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after PCI.

A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to compare the efficacy and safety of CA and TA treatment in patients with ACS after PCI. The endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and bleeding events. The data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, and the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The standards of reporting were in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

13 studies with a total of 58,062 patients were included in this study with a subgroup analysis of the European/American and Asian populations. In terms of effectiveness for MACEs, the European, American and Asian populations benefitted more from the TA treatment than the CA treatment (European and American populations, OR = 0.82, P = 0.0002; Asian, OR = 0.66, P<0.0001; total, OR = 0.78, P<0.0001). In terms of specific effectiveness indicators, such as stroke, MI, and stent thrombosis, the results of TA and CA groups in the European, American, and Asian populations were not consistent. In terms of safety, there was no statistical difference in total bleeding events between TA and CA treatments (OR = 1.19, P = 0.21). However, in the Asian population, the incidence of total bleeding events (OR = 1.52, P = 0.0004) in the TA group was higher than that in the CA group.

The TA treatment in the European and American populations is more beneficial and safer than CA treatment. However, although the Asian population has this benefit, the risk of bleeding is significantly increased as well, and antiplatelet drugs should be chosen carefully.