BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Inclisiran is the first-in-class small interfering RNA (siRNA) proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. In clinical trials inclisiran showed effective and sustained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction of ± 50 %. As data in clinical setting are scarce, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety in clinical practice.
METHODS:We describe a registry of consecutive patients who started with inclisiran at a lipid clinic of a university hospital. Patients were eligible if they fulfilled the reimbursement criteria in the Netherlands. Patients were included if they started with inclisiran as first line (group 1) or switched from PCSK9 monoclonal antibody (mAbs) to inclisiran (group 2). LDL-C levels were measured at 3 and 9 months after initiation of inclisiran. Median change of LDL-C levels was calculated on an individual and group level.
RESULTS:We analysed 65 patients (36 women), median [25th percentile; 75th percentile] age of 63 [54; 68] years. Of these, 44 patients had both a 3 month and 9 month visit. At 3 months, patients who newly started inclisiran (group 1, n = 45) showed a LDL-C decrease of 38 [-49;-33] %. Patients who used statins as co-medication (n = 15) had a higher median LDL-C decrease compared to those without statin use (n=30; 45 % vs 38 %). However, patients who switched from mAbs to inclisiran (group 2, n = 20) had an increase in LDL-C of 38 [+4; +97] %. Adverse effects associated with inclisiran were mild and consisted of mild injection site reactions. Efficacy was slightly less whereas safety results were similar at 9 months.
CONCLUSION:Our initial experience of inclisiran in a clinical setting showed less reduction in LDL-C levels compared to clinical trials but a similar safety profile. Moreover, patients who switched from PCSK9 mAbs to inclisiran generally showed an increase in LDL-C levels implying that inclisiran is less potent in LDL-C reduction compared to PCSK9 mAbs.