Article
作者: Ritacco, G ; Dagli, M L ; Burton, G A ; Schultz, T W ; Botelho, D ; Schember, I ; Chon, H ; Lavelle, M ; Bryant-Friedrich, A ; Lapczynski, A ; Lee, I ; Sullivan, G ; Joshi, K ; Deodhar, C ; Muldoon, J ; Penning, T M ; Cancellieri, M A ; Moustakas, H ; Siddiqi, F ; Bruze, M ; Belsito, D ; Thakkar, Y ; Tokura, Y ; Sadekar, N ; Dekant, W ; Farrell, K ; Fryer, A D ; Jones, L ; Sipes, I G ; Bartlett, A ; Api, A M
A review.The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment.Octyl formate was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, photoirritation/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety.Data from read-across analog amyl formate (CAS # 638-49-3) show that octyl formate is not expected to be genotoxic.Data on read-across analog hexyl acetate (CAS # 142-92-7) provide a calculated Margin of Exposure (MOE) > 100 for the repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints.Data from read-across analog hexyl propionate (CAS # 2445-76-3) show that there are no safety concerns for octyl formate for skin sensitization under the current declared levels of use. The photoirritation/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV/visible (UV/Vis) spectra; octyl formate is not expected to be photoirritating/photoallergenic.For the local respiratory endpoint, a calculated MOE >100 was provided by the read-across analog Bu acetate (CAS # 123-86-4).The environmental endpoints were evaluated; octyl formate was found not to be Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use (VoU) in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.